Distinguishing between contracting contracts and employment contracts in the Iranian legal system: necessities and standards

نوع مقاله : علمی

نویسنده

Professor of Law and Political Science, Khwarazmi, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

One of the consequences of establishing an independent set of regulations to regulate labor relations, compared to the provisions of the Civil Code (regarding the employment of persons), is the need to distinguish contracts subject to the Labor Law from other contracts related to human work, particularly contracting (boycott) contracts. Given the numerous similarities between these two types of contracts, on the one hand, and the fundamental differences in the legal system governing each, on the other, it is necessary to clarify the importance of this matter and carefully analyze the criteria for distinguishing these contracts.
This study, relying on a descriptive and analytical approach, seeks to answer the following specific question: What are the criteria for distinguishing contracting contracts from employment contracts? According to the research findings, no single criterion can be presented for distinction in this regard, while acknowledging that the criterion of "subordination" is the primary factor for distinguishing between these two types of contracts. Other relevant criteria—such as the nature of the operations subject to the contract, the method of payment of wages, the economic situation and level of specialization of the work performer, the duration of the work, and, in particular, contractual stipulations—cannot, on their own, constitute a decisive basis for distinguishing between them. Therefore, examining the circumstances and conditions of each individual case, and comparing it to employment relationships governed by the Labor Law in terms of the availability of the legal elements to prove the relationship subject to the aforementioned law, can assist enforcement officers and judges in this context.
The silence of the legislator and the drafter of regulations, the absence of clear judicial precedents, and the weakness of legal studies in this field are all factors that have created the need to examine this issue and find solutions, taking into account the relevant legal principles and standards. Among the factors that distinguish an employment contract from a contracting contract are: the implementation of the operations subject to the contract is subject to an administrative system; the presence of the person (the worker) in the workplace under the employer's regulatory obligations; the performance of similar work by persons with employment contracts or other types of government employment; the continuity of the implementation of the operations subject to the contract, even with repeated renewals or the conclusion of new contracts; the regular payment of monthly wages; the provision of materials and work tools by the employer; and the payment of additional payments such as overtime and practical assignments.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


1) Ansari, Valiullah (1390), Qaradadha Adari Law Colleges, Chap Panjam, Tehran: Huqoq-Dan and Danshangar.
2) Al-Bahrani, Sheikh Yusuf, Al-Hadiq Al-Nadhirah fi Ahkam Al-Atra Al-Tahirih, Qom: Islamic Publishing Foundation affiliated with the Teachers Group.
3) Bronstein, Arturo (1395), Rights between the Mills and Tatbiqi Kar, translated and edited by Saeedreza Ebdi and Asli Abbasi, Chap Dom, Tehran: Drake.
4) Tangistani, Muhammad Qasim and Ali Taheri (1401), a reflection on the requirement and legal possibility of a regular condition in the decision-making process of the Iranian legal system, an academic chapter on administrative rights, Sal 4, Shamara 13, pp. 243-262.
5) Tangestani, Muhammad Qasim and Mehdi Moradi Berlian (1403), the responsibility of the province of Handa was attributed to the legal costs of the province of Kar in Berber Kargaran and the basis of the law of Kar; Chalashha wa rahkarha, Faslnamah ‘Ilmi Pezhoushahahi Noin Administrative Rights, Sal 6, Shamarah 19, pp. 259-284.
6) Jafari Langroudi, Muhammad Jafar (1386), The Terminology of Rights, Chap Hajdham, Tehran: Ganj Danesh.
7) Sajjadiya, Mehdi and Mustafa Shahbazi (1402), The necessity of a correct and fair economic policy in the monthly decision-making process, Jurisprudence Journal, Cycle 22, Shamara 55, pp. 336-309.
8) Salehi, Hamidreza (1392), The essence of jurisprudence, Qaradadhai Durman, Faslnameh Huqoum Pazshki, Sal 7, Shamarah 27, pp. 127-160.
9) Iraqi, Saydazat Allah (1391), Huqoq Kar (1), Shab Saydazhum, Tehran: Smt.
10) Iraqi, Seidazat Allah and Emir Hossein Ranjparian (1395), Transfer of Rights between Millions of Cars, Chap Dom, Tehran: Car and Social Insurance Foundation.
11) Katouzian, Nasser (1386), Qayeh Haqouqi, Chap Davazdham, Tehran: Sahami Publishing Company.
12) Mohammadi, Sadiq (1397), The impact of Article 38 of the Social Insurance Law on administrative decisions, Law Reviews Chapter, 2nd session, Shamara 19, pp. 107-119.
13) Najjarzadeh Hanjani, Majid (1400), Analysis of the Consideration of a Dawari Condition in Qardad Kar, Faslnamah ‘Ilmi Dīdgāhāhi, Judicial Rights, 26th session, Shamara 93, pp. 73-90.
14) Nikkhwah, Reza and Hamkaran (1396), and Akawi jurisprudence dismantlement of the province of Kardad Kar, Pechoshshahi jurisprudence, 13th session, Shamara 3, pp. 610-583.